Money quote:
I don’t want to get along with the Left. I want to take them down. I want to expose their idiocy for what it is and reveal it as a harmful, dangerous succession of lies and deceptions. My friends say that that effort, aside from being fruitless, will cost me work. It will cost me my career. And I say Wait-a-minute, Bucko. Those folks who founded this country were willing to risk not only their careers, but their property, their families, their very lives…the least I can do in standing up for our precious freedoms is risk a silly television career. Not to compare myself with the brilliant thinkers who declared themselves independent of England and framed our Constitution…but those were some pretty pissed off dudes too. Compared to that, loss of a little TV or movie work seems pretty inconsequential. So in honor of Pissed Off Americans past and present, I rant.I think that may be the most ridiculous passage I have yet read. Ever. Besides, can anyone tell me something Gary Graham has been in as evidence of this television career he speaks of? At any rate, I'm guessing he can find a home with 24 if nothing else.
Memo to author: Other Americans with different political beliefs from yours are not your enemy. Maybe if your party grasped that notion last year, rather than constantly braying on about "real Americans," with the patron saint of this Cult of Real America being Saint Joe the Plumber, they wouldn't have gotten the living crap beaten out of them in elections across the country.
Sullivan makes a good point about the post in question, and the reporterization of Joe the Plumber:
I would have thought the right would start coming home to the reasoned conservatism of Bill Buckley after a shellacking like 2008. I still hope so, because a solid conservatism will ensure that the Left doesn't get too carried away. But there certainly isn't much reason to think the lesson has sunk in yet.Does Pajamas Media believe that the future of journalism really belongs to Joe The Plumber? Or that this is really worth publishing? It seems to me that the right is still culturally disoriented. If they are still promoting Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber and Ann Coulter and culture-war resentment as their core message, they are obviously in deep denial about what this election really meant. If their only unifying theme is hatred or reified "elite liberals", they are doomed.
This denial - this calcification of the worst of the right in the last eight years - is the real danger to Republicans. What they need is a grappling with the public policy issues at hand, and an imaginative constructive, conservative approach to them. But the posturing is so much easier, isn't it? And still, one presumes, really lucrative for a tiny few.



3 comments:
Forget "conservatism," please. It has been operationally Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson's Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:
"[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It .is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth."
Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).
John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com
Recovering Republican
JLof@aol.com
Well, John, I hate to say it, but there is a name for the sort of politics your comment seems to call for: reactionary. Is your contention really that all the country needs to do is turn toward God and everything will be fine? If I recall, we just had the president the rest of us were assured was more godly than any prior one, and I'm pretty sure the country is worse off than before. So forgive me for being skeptical of the idea that a lack of God is all that needs our attention.
And quoting the Chief of Staff of a general of a treasonous venture is really not the best way to support an argument. Unless God was really on the side of the Confederacy...
You get the best spam.
Post a Comment